|
|
Post by Fn Siggi on Jun 29, 2005 10:10:24 GMT -5
sorry m8, but i have read the rulez and we dont agree with them so we retire Fn from this tournament
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin1 - Sdym on Jun 29, 2005 10:30:03 GMT -5
what dont u like in this rulez plz ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fn BlackSoul on Jun 29, 2005 10:49:19 GMT -5
This rules are not good.. the admins are only RiQ members... chatfrag in wars not enable and strategy not enable too.... and 3vs3 is no fum.. 4vs4 it's better..... so we'll join to cB league... more funny, better rules....
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin1 - Sdym on Jun 29, 2005 10:52:11 GMT -5
ok np but there is not only RiQ admin  they are R@ RiQ NET and NC soon gl  |
|
|
|
Post by Admin6 on Jun 29, 2005 12:50:09 GMT -5
i agree with Fn in one point.... i would allow chatfrag too, cuz it's a war and no chatroom.  for team-co-ordination we can use binds or teamspeak.  if someone wanna melt his clan mate, he only has to go next to him and hopens the console and write something and nobody should be allowed to shoot him then  |
|
|
|
Post by <xT>SpeaR on Jun 29, 2005 13:23:50 GMT -5
FFS dont u all get it ? offcourse chatfrag is allowed ffs , this is tournament , not a f**king chatroom, if u wanna chat during the game - go msn or talk to ur mom or w/e .. btw in 1 of these pages 1 admin wrote
[glow=red,2,300]''Chat at own risk people ! ''[/glow]so d**nit , dont u get it ?? chatfrag should be allowed .. if otherwise - lets say u are alone now and they are 2 enemys . and 1 of them is in front of u - chatting - then u had the chance to kill him but the rules say '' no chatfrag '' and then ull die when u cant shoot him , his buddy shoot u!! ffs im so pissed of this chatF.A.G thing ..
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin1 - Sdym on Jun 29, 2005 13:30:40 GMT -5
Rulez did make then Chatfrag is not tollerded ... thx
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin6 on Jun 29, 2005 13:44:48 GMT -5
thx too |
|
|
|
Post by admin7 on Jun 29, 2005 13:56:52 GMT -5
well spear it's good u came here to tell your opinion..but u could chill down a bit..we still pwn them,with or without chatfrag  |
|
|
|
Post by (tk)chioro on Jun 29, 2005 14:05:16 GMT -5
one question more...camping...in my opinion camping is not good, but in a few situations it is a tactik...like if u play 3v3 and 2 of your team are freezed...so...now you can't run into a group of 3 players...so you must go back and attack them from other points...at the time you got them on the wrong foot...that's my opinion...i think the admins should only go vs. players, who do extrem camping (like every second frag a backrun)
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin2 on Jun 29, 2005 18:11:04 GMT -5
no speak = no team speak !! ha ha.... that is the question...
|
|
|
|
Post by admin7 on Jun 29, 2005 19:24:29 GMT -5
chatfrag should be allowed..who is utterly stupid to chat during a tournament game? :s
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin1 - Sdym on Jun 30, 2005 3:39:29 GMT -5
no speak = no spram
no camp = dont camp during all the war, indeed camp could be a tactik and this is tolered, but camp always during all the war is not tolereded
u can speak on team right there is no probleme . . .
|
|
|
|
Post by Cartman on Jun 30, 2005 3:53:00 GMT -5
lol... about camp... I am not an 'always move it' player... I wait until the enemy comes to me... so I am sometimes a lil campy player... but when I see my enemy... I directly move away... thats a way of camp... but not a LAME way of camp... hehe.... think some guys allready knew this... ;D ;D ;D camp for me... is staying at a place for more than 2 kills... not 1 kill... otherwise I have to change my strategy   ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Admin1 - Sdym on Jun 30, 2005 3:54:56 GMT -5
hehe no, dont change it u cant do this, i mean just dont be on the same place during all the war u can camp but not CAMP during all the war and wait enemy when advers are frozen more long time |
|
they are R@ RiQ NET and NC soon 
;D